Reinstating IVIG Coverage

The Denial
After 8 years of stable, insurer-approved IVIG treatment for PANS, a 16-year-old boy’s new employer-sponsored plan through Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan denied coverage—threatening his medical progress, educational access, and mental health. Despite documented success with in-home Gammagard infusions and worsening symptoms following a 5-month care gap after discontinuation, the insurer claimed his condition was investigational and unsupported. His mother, a former nurse, had already exhausted every traditional avenue. Claimable was her last hope to reverse the denial before further deterioration.
The Appeal
Claimable guided the family through a personalized, evidence-backed appeal that:
- Asserted continuation criteria based on long-standing treatment—not new initiation standards
- Documented past medical necessity, in-home safety, and clear clinical benefit
- Included expert support from the treating neurologist with over 40 years of experience
- Highlighted regressions after treatment interruption
- Invoked policy inconsistencies, excessive documentation requests, and ERISA protections
The Result
Within days of submission, the appeal was approved. The child’s IVIG therapy resumed, sparing the family thousands in out-of-pocket costs and restoring access to the only treatment that had meaningfully improved his health.
Be the first to know
Get the latest updates on new tools, inspiring patient stories, expert appeal tips, and more—delivered to your inbox.
You're on the list!






